• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

Our mission is to construct trust in blockchains, crypto-crawler and as a trusted investigative accomplice to governments around the world, preventing terrorists from using cryptocurrency is one in all our main responsibilities. It’s a serious activity, and it’s vital to be responsible and cryptographer judicious when releasing data on a subject as consequential as terrorism financing. False experiences cannot solely misinform analysis, but additionally damage the popularity of individual cryptocurrency corporations and the business as a complete.

Over the previous several months, three situations of erroneous evaluation led to misleading headlines that proceed to spread concern. We’d like to make some clarifications. This week, stories circulated that Hans-Jakob Schindler, empty value 0x returned from contract director of the suppose tank the Counter Extremism Project, said that authorities have searched for ISIS’s lacking war chest since 2017 and that he's wondering if the $300 million has not been discovered because cryptocurrency "might have been one of the methods it may need been used…

This would be an ideal storage mechanism till it is needed.

Whereas Schindler’s statement means that he doesn't have exhausting evidence and is speculating on a idea, media sensationalized it into headlines together with "Fears missing ISIS hundreds of thousands are hidden in cryptocurrency prepared to be used as warfare chest," "ISIS has £246million Bitcoin battle chest to spend on bloody terror comeback marketing campaign, knowledgeable warns," and "ISIS’s $300 million war chest is hidden in Bitcoin, says suppose tank".

Schindler’s principle can also be extremely unlikely. We all know that almost all terrorism financing campaigns have raised lower than $10,000, indicating restricted adoption. Further, if ISIS had funneled oil proceeds into Bitcoin, trading volume of regional exchanges and cash service companies would have mirrored this flow of funds. After all, cryptocurrency is also not necessarily the best storage mechanism for illicit funds.

Not like cash and other traditional types of value switch, cryptocurrency is inherently clear. Each transaction is recorded in a publicly seen ledger. With the right tools, we can stop dangerous actors from abusing the system for terrorism financing and other crimes.

We saw another unlucky instance of misinformation spreading earlier this 12 months when experiences mischaracterized the size and scope of a terrorism fundraising campaign run by Common Resistance Committees (PRC) by way of Cash4PS, a money service business based mostly in Gaza.

News tales stated the group had raised nearly $24 million. We broke down how we used Chainalysis Reactor to point out that if PRC raised any money in any respect, it was considerably lower than $24M. There have been two errors that led to this mistaken conclusion. First, analysts started off assuming that each one transfers to Cash4PS addresses were related to terror financing. While some Cash4PS addresses may belong to terrorist teams or their associates, there’s no evidence to recommend all of them are.

Second, analysts relied on a generic blockchain explorer, which does indicate that upwards of $24 million price of Bitcoin has been obtained by Cash4PS addresses. However, the vast majority of those transfers are from other Cash4PS addresses. Overall, slightly below $1M has been transferred to Cash4PS addresses from the outside.